I commented about this over at ExGayWatch.
We know that orgs like NOM, FRC and FOTF have also used Spitzer as an example, and Dobson is guilty of outright distorting legitimate research.
And, disregarding and ignoring these same researchers complaints and appeals to cease and desist.
NOM’s reps have gone into denial mode of their activity and agenda when it comes to engaging voters against gays and lesbians.
I’m certain that they will respond to Spitzer’s renouncement in several ways.
1. They won’t acknowledge it and pretend he didn’t say it and try to scrub him from their history of using him for their purpose.
2. They’ll say he’s a tired old man, that helplessly had to capitulate to the pressures of the ‘militant homosexual agenda’, the way he did back in the 70′s. Because gay people are so relentless and threatening against those who disagree with them, or don’t do what they say.
3. That he was never a big enough or important enough study in the first place so why don’t we all move on and forget him?
10…9…8…7…